Before
I started birdwatching three & a half years ago, I only knew of teal along
with widgeon as ducks that hunters stalked, shot and ate - I assumed they must
be big fat birds like mallards. In bird guides they were described and
illustrated as very definite colours - chestnut, green and yellow etc.
I
first saw real teal within the last three years, and then initially only as
far-off black spots out on the water that other birdwatchers had pointed out. Then I
saw some myself but still from a long way away - I could just see their yellow rear
patch to identify them and that was all, any closer approach and they were
gone.
So it
came as something of a revelation to see them at very close quarters on the Bristol Ornithological Club
trip to Farlington Marshes, and then close again at Kings Weston Lane reservoir
last week. How different from bird guide illustrations! Far from being definite
colours, they conjure up words like ethereal, satiny, silvery... Every different angle and quality of light
casts them differently - now the head seems quite pale, then it suddenly
appears as flashing patterns of red and green. Their bodies shimmer with subtle
colours and the yellow patches fade and flash back to prominence - like the exquisite members of some Diaghilev
ballet, Schehezerades of the water...
January
Geology
musings
Because
it's so dark and wet and blowy, and probably because I've started a geology
course on understanding sedimentary rocks, I've been doing a little musing....
....Imagine
that human history finished right now (you can give or take a few hundred
years) - what would the geological record look like in say 5 or 10 million
years? That's about the shortest geological period in which to get a meaningful
view, amounting to a sedimentary section a few inches thick. What would happen
to cities? Skyscapers? Allow for about 1mm of compacted sediment being laid
down every 100 years.
Here
are some images to conjure with:
- In
5 million years there would be some movement of continents, but not a huge
amount.
- If
another ice age occurred, glaciation could fell a city, and chunks of building
would be carried along, to drop out as erratic boulders hundreds of miles away.
Then they’d be subject to further erosion and deposition...
- I
can imagine a single skinny conglomerate layer worldwide, representing all our
civilisation, and containing little shards of plastic detritus, and weird
chemical compounds.
- I
wonder what would happen to those new artificial islands the Arabs are
developing, full of skyscapers etc.? There’s not a lot of extreme weather
there, like hurricanes. Seas rising would perhaps start their downfall -
it wouldn’t take too much erosion to wash away the foundations. When they fell in
the sea they would form lovely new coral colonies...
Anyone
got any other images?
April
I was very moved
last night to watch a programme narrated by David Attenborough, about Ernest
Thompson Seton, the 19th to 20th century American writer and naturalist.
I have mentioned
him once before in this group when we were discussing favourite birds I think –
I said I’d like to be a sociable rook, and had been inspired in this by ETS’s
writing about the rooks’ life from their point of view, plus his lovely
drawings. I read his books extensively as a child but never seemed to have
heard him mentioned since, and it gave me a real start to see the original
Victorian-style cover of ‘Wild Animals I Have Known’ on the screen – so familiar
to me yet not seen for so long.
I was thinking
about him when Des Bowring started his thread about which books had inspired people to
become interested in nature. I didn’t respond because, I now realise, the books
that had absolutely gripped me were ones about what it was like to BE a wild
creature and this seemed somehow childish and frivolous in light of Des’
question. The Kipling ‘Mowgli’ books fell into this category, and till I was
almost a teenager I was counting down, ‘I’ve still got 8-7-6…3 years left to become
a jungle child like Mowgli and learn those skills and live like that…’ (I think
Mowgli left the jungle when he was 15?).
Otherwise I knew
little about ETS, and it was great to find out how his intense love of the
American wilderness and the animals who inhabited it was so influential in
changing public awareness, forming the first national parks, and creating the
start of an environmentalist/ecological movement there. And only now, 100 years
on, has his view that a wilderness needs its balance of predators as well as
prey started coming to fruition (specifically the wolf which was the core of
Attenborough’s programme and the epiphany causing ETS’ change from hunter to
preservationist). Maybe more people and children will start reading his books
again?
Walking the River Thames
I
just spent a couple of days walking the River Thames and gravel lakes around
Letchlade. It’s odd after being used to cliff paths to walk on the level mile
after mile, as well as the dream-like quality of being alone by a smoothly
swift-flowing river in Spring. There seemed to be a wren in almost every bush,
singing so loud it was almost deafening. Many reed buntings and chaffinches,
but few warblers, and I only saw one heron.
-
Blackbird: On Monday dusk I sat by the river and listened to a blackbird practice an unusual song phrase
over and over. Sometimes he gave it jazzy twists, sometimes he transposed it
into a different key.
-
Swans: At dusk I saw a lovely sight - two pairs of young swans ‘mirroring’each
others' dips, ducks and
nuzzles etc, sometimes in parallel and sometimes as a
mirror. Next day I saw some fine examples of ‘threat’ behaviour, with the
male’s neck laid back so far and the head pulled down so low it was almost
invisible behind the raised wings, and paddling hard enough to raise a bow
wave.
![]() |
Angry mute swan by Mike Pennington |
-
Rooks: I’ve seen such a mass of rookeries on this trip, as well as on a
previous one passing though Salisbury Plain to Lulworth Cove. Are they
doing particularly well this year? My Bed & Breakfast bedroom in Lechlade looked out
one, and I admired the elegant curve the rooks took through the branches as
they swooped down and up from their nests. An elderly gent told me that the
height of their nests is supposed to foretell the weather - the higher the
better the summer. If so, then some rookeries give a concensus on fair, while
others are a mixed bag and hedging their bets.
-
Terns: there were quite a few terns flying up and down the river. Now tell me
this: what do terns have against the south west? I’ve not seen a tern along the
coast in south or west Wales, Somerset, Devon, Cornwall or Dorset. The times I
have, it’s been along the Grand Union Canal in and up from London, on the Isle
of Wight crossing, and here.
-
Swallow: I had the closest view I’ve had yet of a swallow, sitting placidly on a
post and allowing one to fully appreciate the beauty of its gunmetal blue back
glistening in the sunshine.
-
Fish: I saw a large flotilla of largish long fish sized between about 30-40cm
(Thames trout? Chub?) cruising silently a couple of inches below the water
surface, remaining there as long as I watched. It was strange because though I
was constantly looking into the river, I otherwise didn’t see other fish and
only saw a few splashes.
-
Fritillary flowers: In one riverside meadow field I saw some unusual reddish flowers
in the distance. On
inspection they turned out to be a whole area of
fritillaries with the largest blooms I’ve ever seen - larger than any garden
centre display. Can the botanists shed any light on this? (Snake's Head Fritillaries - as the water meadows fringing the river flood, the bulbs are washed downstream to propagate new areas)
![]() |
Snake's Head Fritillaries by Tony Hisgett, Birmingham |
-
Hare: I saw a fine hare startling two curlews grazing in a field, as it
lolloped between them.
-
Agression: You can really feel the hormones in the air at this time of year, the
forceful singing and the aggression. On my first evening a group of cows with
their calves on a field with the footpath through it had a go at me. Next day
having a drink at a riverside pub a domestic goose drove me from the garden.
And on the river path one wren stayed so fearlessly close as I walked past its
bush that I thought it would have a go at me too!
May
Swifts - fooling the eye
Swifts are here! About 10 so far, not singing, but if flight can express joy that's what they're showing in abundance. Saw a stunning manoeuvre: a pair close-coupled and moving in tandem did a sudden perfect turn
'on the spot'. They also have this strange ability like Spitfires, to apparently appear out of nowhere and then disappear again into empty sky - how do they do that? Is it a *Derren Brown effect? (* British illusionist)
![]() |
Swift, by Ken Billington |
May
Swifts
- fooling the eye
Since
my recent 'Derren Brown' comment on how swifts deceive the eye as they fly, I have been studying the flight of our local Filton swifts to
try and understand how. This is what I have noticed:
-
They bank swiftly from side to side. This means they often present their
slimmest profile to view.
-
They frequently do that little shimmer of the wings.
-
They can turn on a sixpence and zoom off at massive speed in another direction.
The
combination means that often they present their slimmest profile and do a
little shimmer, which totally fools the eye - blurring their existence and
rendering them momentarily almost invisible. If they then immediately zoom away
in another direction, your eye has lost them and it's as though they had
disappeared!
Why
do they bank and shimmer? Is it to fool prey, or predators, or both, or to
shake moisture from their wings? It struck me with the recent thunderstorm and
rain, what it means to stay up in all that weather permanently. It really makes
sense of their extra size and sturdiness compared with swallows and martins -
you gotta be strong!
July
Darwin
and Engels
Having
finished and much enjoyed Darwin's 'The Expression of the Emotions in Man and
Animals ' I was intrigued in the introduction to learn that Engels read it and
while appreciating the contents, despised the way it was written - 'typically
English', he said. I assume he meant
that it is written in a very informal, non-academic way, fully admitting where
there are gaps in evidence, giving many examples from observing his own
children, and even having notes saying things like, 'Prof Soandso has pointed
out the weakness in my argument here, and I must agree with him.'
Now
it's a long time since I read Marx and Engels who very much changed my way of
thinking, and whom I admire for putting 'who profits?' into historical analysis
and thus actually making sense of history instead of a meaningless list of
monarchs and battles. And I can't
remember how 'pseudo-scientifically' it was written, but I feel if their works
had been written more in the Darwin style it would have been harder for the
Soviets to turn it into ironclad dogma with an apparently scientific basis.
Because of course there wasn't such a basis - it was the authors' own ideas and
observations, pertinent though they may have been.
It
was also an eye-opener to learn how the anthropologist Margaret Mead and her
followers villified Darwin's work (unscientifically) because of certain
concerns they had about its use politically (how Soviet!). Yet now I understand
Mead herself is discredited in many ways - for instance, she was a mere 23 when
she went to Samoa, and the Samoans admitted to later workers (with a better
grasp of the language and culture) that they had fed her a lot of stories of
the sort they could see she wanted to hear - that'll be the juicy sexy ones I
expect.
Sorry,
this isn't strictly wildlife, just wanted to get that off my chest.
July
South
Pembrokeshire coast
I
have been walking the South Pembrokeshire coast for 4 days west of
Manorbier, from Stackpole towards Milford Haven.
-
Firstly, I encountered an extraordinary huge caterpillar and I’m longing to
know what it is: it was 2 ½ inches long, as thick as my finger, brilliant green
and regularly banded with thin velvet black stripes with small white spots. It
was perservering on the sandy coast path though there was inviting vegetation
on each side, but not making too good a job of it as it kept tilting or
flopping rather helplessly sideways. (Wasn’t identified - possibly an
escaped rarity)
-
Peregrines along the coast: My first evening I saw what I thought what was
swifts mobbing a kestrel. A day later I saw what I thought was a buzzard and
kestrel again being mobbed by martins and swallows - then realised they were
both peregrines. Later again I saw what I thought was a buzzard on a post: big,
upright pose - but no, again it was a peregrine; as I approached it flew off,
went ito a steep dive down the cliff, and soared up fast almost vertically to a
favoured perch on the cliff face.I
watched a larger bird take a small prey to what could have been a nest site -
a smooth, well-worn little sheltered platform on an inaccessible cliff; while the
‘smaller’ ‘browner’ birds I had mistaken for kestrels flew around as it ate. On
my last day very early in the morning I saw a threesome flying together east
above the beach. Obviously I was watching family groups, though whether the
same one on different sections of coast, or different ones I don’t know. After
doing peregrine watches on the Downs you’d think I’d have all this
identification off pat, but it is always different on one’s own without expert
eyes to help!
-
Funnel webs on the cliff path from Freshwater Bay to Stackpole: many of the
gorse bushes displayed complex gauze web structures, all leading back to a
funnel if inspected closely. Some of the attaching margins were covered or
formed of a shiny membrane that glinted in the sun; and I also noticed that
though the sun was hot enough to have burned away any dew on surrounding
vegetation, some of the webs held what appeared to be big dew drops on the
gauze, adding to the sparkling appearance. One funnel was in its purest form:
like a narrow-necked, wide-bottomed beaker of gauze, delicately attached at
three points to three gorse sprigs.
- The
cliffs west from Stackpole are where the Old Red Sandstone turns to Carboniferous.
From a level
plateau on top they drop smooth and vertical about 150-200 feet -
worse than vertical in many places where they actually slope inwards about 5
degrees. Stretches for climbers alternate with stretches left for breeding
birds - and you can see why the birds need protection 'cos on a hot, still
Saturday these awe-inspiring cliffs were infested with climbers. I asked one
group how they rated them for difficulty on a UK scale and they said - very
hard - smooth, very few holds, overhangs... Progressing west there are more
heartstopping sights for the vertiginously challenged: Horseman’s Leap where a
stack has separated from the main cliffs by just two or three feet - but look
down and those three feet are sheer from top to roiling sea at the bottom... A
natural arch where the underside is thin and cut perfectly level horizontally
about 40 feet above the sea, looking like a guillotine or drawbridge... Places
where from the narrowest gap the sea has carved a deep narrow isosceles
triangle inland, isosceles in plan but again completely vertical sides...
Savage grandeur... Beautiful limstone-meadow flora.
![]() |
by Alan Rolfe |
The
clifftop heathland from St Govans towards Milford Haven was full of a lovely
selection of small birds: whinchat, stonechat, wheatear, linnet, goldfinch,
pippet; and gatekeeper, meadow brown and other butterflies in profusion as
well as an occasional red admiral, marbled white, and blue. Chough sightings increased from scattered couples
grazing to family groups in playful flight; and a local birder said
a bit further west Dartford warblers had been breeding for the first time in
the last couple of years.
Crows/apples
Yesterday
there were a pair of crows eating apples on next door's tree. They attacked the
fruit with extraordinary - frightening - force, great pecking blows that sent
showers of the fruit flesh about.
August
‘E
O Wilson’s ‘Sociobiology’
I
have just finished reading a great science classic, E O Wilson’s
‘Sociobiology’, 1980 abridged edition (‘Sociobiology: the systematic study of
the biological basis of all social behaviour.’). This is one of those
extraordinary books whose main tenets and observations have pervaded
our/society’s minds so completely that one does not recognise the source until
one reads the original - like Freud and the concept of the unconscious. One of
the book’s most significant observations to me, is how throughout the animal
kingdom there are intrinsic conflicts between the needs and desires of the
individual, the family, and the groups containing the family and individual.
The torments mankind suffers because of these conflicts are not ours alone, nor
are they in any way necessarily reconcilable (except at a spiritual level) -
much though we and our politicians would often like to hope otherwise.
Another
striking thing is how one can be reading an analysis of a creature as humble as
a flatworm or other invertebrate and thinking, ‘Oh my God, that’s just like
humans.’ Lower creatures have some sophisticated behaviour, and we are so often
not alone in our reactions... Anyway, I recommend it to those who like this
sort of thing.
October
I
have been very struck and impressed this year, by two fennel plants growing in
my garden. Their slender stems grow up to about 6' tall and by the later summer
are weighted by substantial flower / seed heads. However they survive every
storm going without bending or breaking - a miracle of natural engineering.
Just now I cut their stems down and was able to study their structure in more
detail. The stems are segmented like bamboo, hollow and pith-lined in section.
Perhaps the most impressive thing is to tug the cut stems at the base. They do
not thicken there in any appreciable way, but one can feel that they are welded
deeply into the root structure, and neither stem nor root responds at all to
heavy pulling. Amazing!
Ove Arup Engineers, eat your heart out!
November
Starling
display
I saw a
nice sight from my loft a couple of days ago, on a sunny, windy late afternoon. A
flock of about thirty starlings gradually increased to about fifty and
collected on the roof opposite. They flew up and around in a cloud, and then
suddenly dispersed to the large bare ash tree behind the roofs where they
distributed themselves evenly throughout the outer branches, looking like
leaves or bunches of ash keys. Every now and then one would drop away like a
falling leaf, and seemingly, as the wind gusted strongly, a whole group were
'blown' out of the tree and away together out of view.
December
Crow
This morning a crow
was perched on a roof ridge opposite, holding some carrion; it held the
flesh firmly down with one foot while tearing off pieces with its strong beak, and
head and neck. I was very intrigued to see how similar this behaviour was not only to a
larger raptor like an eagle, but also say
to a lion or tiger, holding down prey with a big paw and tearing off flesh with
powerful teeth, jaws and head.
Sparrows in the park
In my local park on the sunny afternoon this Wednesday, sparrow song was loudly in evidence. Particularly on the south-facing boundary made up of high bramble and ivy thickets, the sparrows made a positive 'wall of sound' of wonderful zest and vigour.
Sparrows in the park
In my local park on the sunny afternoon this Wednesday, sparrow song was loudly in evidence. Particularly on the south-facing boundary made up of high bramble and ivy thickets, the sparrows made a positive 'wall of sound' of wonderful zest and vigour.
No comments:
Post a Comment